|
Post by Admin on Aug 25, 2006 18:16:15 GMT
Thats unfair, i mean if you had half a year of xbox live left and then you buy a 360, you cant transfer your money. Thats Harsh!
|
|
|
Post by The Lost Jedi on Aug 26, 2006 1:40:41 GMT
That is quite evil.
|
|
Rubypoke
Getting To Know Your Way
To the Petercopter!
Posts: 69
|
Post by Rubypoke on Aug 26, 2006 12:37:10 GMT
Well i Have no xbox, but £5 a month ontop of the cost of broadband, thats way too much for me!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 27, 2006 14:05:50 GMT
ontop of the price of an xbox, the games, controllers, television, electricity, telephone, mortgage, tax................ gaming isnt cheap
|
|
|
Post by The Lost Jedi on Aug 27, 2006 18:23:49 GMT
Don't forget the head-set if you want to communicate with people online. They add to the fee of it aswell, although they don't cost too much, mine was only £8 + £3 for postage off of eBay.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 28, 2006 11:38:23 GMT
And the cost of water so your voice dosent go dry while talking....and food to live.
|
|
|
Post by The Lost Jedi on Sept 5, 2006 0:53:53 GMT
And the cost of water so your voice dosent go dry while talking....and food to live. Yeah, Microsoft is pushing it.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 11, 2006 18:57:25 GMT
Well at least its a good service, unlike what sony had promiced yet failed to deliver with the ps2's network play or whatever...
|
|
|
Post by INNOVATE OR DIE on Sept 14, 2006 22:07:49 GMT
Playstation and network play should never be used in the same sentence unless its a restraining order to keep playstation away from networking.
|
|
|
Post by greendaemon on Sept 16, 2006 21:23:24 GMT
yeh i had it for a 30day free trial and i was so pissed off with it mainly because it lags and cuts you off if you shoot to fast. i mean whats that all about. idunno. you tell me.
|
|
|
Post by INNOVATE OR DIE on Sept 19, 2006 22:36:38 GMT
check dis : 10 man team swat coagulation with two snipers , two battle riflers and two three man warthogs. that would be kickass.
|
|
|
Post by Master Chief on Sept 21, 2006 6:16:49 GMT
yh but that would be better not swat it would lat longer and ppl on hog wouldnt die as much
|
|
|
Post by The Lost Jedi on Sept 25, 2006 22:43:55 GMT
Plus why waste a sniper round in SWAT on someone when you could easily Battle Rifle them.
|
|
|
Post by INNOVATE OR DIE on Oct 1, 2006 22:53:29 GMT
true , but i didn't mean team swat , i actually meant team slayer but like a swat team like you cant change weapon so you chose what you wanna be at the beginning and then you have to work together to get things done.
|
|
|
Post by Master Chief on Oct 3, 2006 7:01:17 GMT
i get what neo means and that would be pretty kool and even better would be if each team had a leader they had to kill but the leader had a sheild but no sensor.
|
|